Connect with us


Zifa apologies – NewsDay


ZIFA has taken responsibility for the national football team’s disappointing elimination from the World Cup qualifying campaign following their back-to-back defeats to Ghana earlier this week.

Zimbabwe’s slim hopes were effectively extinguished by a 1-0 home defeat to Ghana on Tuesday.

The feeling of outrage following the two defeats was an all too familiar one for the Warriors fans, some of whom are already calling for the head of interim coach Norman Mapeza. Some players have allegedly suffered abuse on social media as a consequence.

Zifa has come to their defence and is taking the blame for the team’s early dismissal. The association is urging the disappointed fans and other stakeholders to desist from insulting Mapeza and his players “who all gave it their all albeit on a losing cause”.

“To suggest that the team was not committed is grossly unfair to these dedicated group who aspired to do well for their beloved nation. We are proud, therefore, of the Warriors’ performances despite lack of a positive results. Their commitment was clear to us to see. It is this commitment to their country that we salute more than the result,” Zifa said in a statement yesterday.

Mapeza replaced Zdravko Logarušic, who had managed one point from two matches, with the former Warriors captain given the mandate to revive the World Cup campaign.

Things went horribly wrong for him as Zimbabwe fell 3-1 away in Ghana on Saturday on his first match in charge.

Thomas Partey scored the only goal for the Black Stars on Tuesday at the National Sports Stadium, a in a painful defeat that left the Warriors fans with that all familiar feeling of having no realistic hopes of qualifying to the World Cup finals with some games left to play.

The manner of the defeat and the toothless nature of the team in particular, was in stark contrast to the positivity that abounded in the match in Cape Coast, despite the loss. This is what probably angered fans the most, some of whom are questioning the players’ commitment to the national team cause.

“Zifa as the institution responsible for football in Zimbabwe, therefore ,takes full responsibility of the Warriors’ failure to qualify for world cup irrespective of several impediments that further complicated the journey. We fully understand the disappointment that comes with every unfavourable result from the national teams because we know just how much Zimbabweans love and support their team.”

Zimbabwe’s remaining matches in the qualifiers are against South Africa away on November 11 before hosting Ethiopia three days later. Mapeza and his bosses have said they will use the two deadrubber matches to prepare a team for the Africa Cup of Nations finals which will be played in January.

“Zifa will take lessons from the two matches (against Ghana) and without compromising performance on the remaining world cup matches, shift attention to the upcoming Africa Cup of Nations finals.

The association was also forced to defend the Warriors’ travel arrangement which saw them using a commercial flight back home and arriving on Monday afternoon after stop overs in Ethiopia and South Africa.

Ghana on the other hand, arrived on Sunday night aboard a charter plane.

“Zifa has received numerous inquiries from stakeholders on why Ghana arrived in Zimbabwe earlier than our own Warriors after the first leg. Their fear was that Zifa had probably not prepared adequately for the two matches. While Ghana flew directly from Ghana to Harare on a government-funded chartered flight, our Warriors used a commercial flight secured using the association’s resources. The flight route used by the Warriors to travel from Accra to Harare was the fastest on the earliest possible flight. For the first leg in Ghana, players travelled directly to the match venue to reduce travel distances which would have affected their preparedness for the match.”

Zifa is also hoping that the return of local football competitions previously suspended due to COVID-19 restrictions will increase national team coaches’ selection options.

“Zifa will work tirelessly and institute corrective measures to ensure that the Warriors emerge victorious for the future and create a positive narrative. We are now dedicating efforts on resumption of football leagues, junior football and Afcon tournament.”

Follow Henry on Twitter @henrymhara


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chartered Flight For MPs To Vic Falls For 2022 National Pre-Budget Seminar – New

Spread This News

By Anna Chibamu

PARLIAMENT will avail a chartered flight for MPs to attend the 2022 annual pre-budget seminar in the resort city of Victoria Falls.

House of Assembly Speaker Jacob Mudenda confirmed the 2022 pre-budget seminar will be held this weekend.

Mudenda told National Assembly members Tuesday all MPs residing from provinces furthest Victoria Falls, such as Harare, Mashonaland East, West, Central, Manicaland will fly to the resort city Friday morning.

However, MPs from Masvingo, Midlands, Bulawayo, Matabeleland North, Matabeleland South province will use their parliamentary-issued vehicles to travel for the all-paid weekend seminar.

The seminar follows public consultations carried out countrywide by Parliament ahead of the 2022 national budget to be presented by Finance Minister Mthuli Ncube next month.

However, previous national budgets have come under fire from citizens who feel the budgets have become documents filled with figures with no meaning as the country’s economy continues to worsen.

Continue Reading


US Congress Approves Zimbabwe's $213.2m HIV Response Support – New

Spread This News

By Staff Reporter

MORE than 1.2 million Zimbabweans living with HIV will continue receiving life-saving treatment and health services enabling them to lead long and healthy lives.

Thousands of health care workers will also continue carrying out their critical work under the latest country plan approved by the United States.

The US Congress approved $213.2 million for the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) 2021 country plan for Zimbabwe, reflecting strong coordination between the United States and key partners, including the Ministry of Health and Child Care, the Global Fund, UNAIDS, and civil society.

The approved plan will advance client-centered services, support Zimbabwe health care workers, and implement resilient programmes designed to mitigate the impacts of Covid-19.

More than US$9.4 million of the total comes from the American Rescue Plan Act to strengthen health systems, such as the electronic health record and national surveillance systems, already helping screen and track Covid-19 at Zimbabwe’s ports of entry.

U.S. Embassy Chargé d’ Affaires Thomas Hastings has recognised the enormous contributions to the HIV response by civil society organizations, people living with HIV, health workers and implementing partners during an especially challenging year due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

“I commend the Zimbabwean communities for continuing to work despite challenges posed by Covid-19.  Support under the PEPFAR program couldn’t have come at better time to ensure people continue to receive HIV treatment and other lifesaving services,” he said.

More than 1.27 million people live with HIV in Zimbabwe, including 1.19 million adults and nearly 76,000 children.

The PEPFAR 2021 plan supports 100 percent treatment coverage within every district and across all ages, ensuring people like 46-year-old Patricia Padzura, a Harare resident diagnosed with HIV 20 years ago, remain on treatment and continue to live healthy lives.

“Getting onto HIV treatment is the best thing that ever happened to my life,” Padzura said. “I am healthy and most importantly, I am happy that the virus in my blood is now undetectable.”

In the year ahead, PEPFAR will invest more than $40 million to support nearly 200,000 vulnerable girls and young women aged 10-24 in Zimbabwe under the DREAMS (Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored, and Safe) programme.

Since 2015, DREAMS has reached more than 785,000 girls with HIV and violence prevention education and services, educational assistance, economic strengthening, and post-violence care.

About $9 million of support will benefit nearly 53,000 Zimbabwean LGBTQI+ community members, targeting men who have sex with men and transgender people.

While no PEPFAR assistance goes directly to the Government of Zimbabwe, it does support thousands of health care workers through implementing partners and non-government organizations who carry out the work under close Embassy oversight.

PEPFAR supports these health care workers, as well as key staff in district and regional health offices and laboratories, with salary supplements, stipends, travel expenses, and other forms of support.

PEPFAR’s support to Zimbabwe, including the $1.7 billion cumulative investment since 2003, has vastly and positively changed the direction of the HIV epidemic.

The second Zimbabwe Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (ZIMPHIA 2020) reflected this impact, noting that among all Zimbabweans on HIV treatment, 90.3% had achieved viral load suppression, meaning they effectively have no risk of transmitting HIV to others.

Continued PEPFAR investment will ensure Zimbabwe remains on track to attaining epidemic control and ending AIDS by 2030.

Continue Reading


OPINION | Maynard Manyowa: South Africa's lax border controls played a role in the red list issue – News24

The slow pace to move South Africa off the UK’s red list could have been as a result of South Africa’s lax border controls, writes Maynard Manyowa.

At midnight, on 11 October, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland removed South Africa from its ‘red list’, but only when it had relaxed most of its own rules surrounding travel, and life in the country had returned to normal. Currently only seven countries remain on the red list, most of them being South American Spanish speaking countries where the UK is not a prime destination anyway – the United States is. In truth, South Africa was only removed at the same time as Afghanistan, and when the UK was taking the final steps to abolish the traffic light system altogether.

What was the red list?

Under the three-tier travel traffic light system, passengers arriving in the UK from a green list country or passengers who had spent ten days in a green list country didn’t have to self-quarantine on arrival. All they required was a negative Covid test taken days before arrival. 

Passengers from amber list countries were required to take a test before coming to the UK, self-quarantine at home, and book for a test on day two and day eight of their arrival. This was largely seen as inconvenient but tolerable. 

However, passengers from the red list were subject to some of the harshest health screening protocols in recent times. They were required to book and pay for an 11-night quarantine in a managed hotel at the cost of £2 285 (R46,000). They were also required to pay for pre-departure Covid tests. 

The entire scheme was scandalous, and the experience was torrid. I flew back to the UK on 20 August through South Africa. I landed to an effective prison. I could only leave my hotel for 15 minutes supervised exercise a day – way less than the 30 minutes to an hour that death row inmates receive in the United States. 

READ | Scrapping UK travel red list might just save SA’s peak tourism season

But if it was scandalous, it was absurd too. My wife, a South African national, flew out of South Africa on 4 September, first to Dubai and then to London Heathrow. She had to pay £2,285 (R46,000) as well. On top of that, Emirates Airlines required her to test the day before departure at the cost of R800 and then six hours before boarding at the cost of R1400. On arrival, those who had spent ten days in Dubai were allowed to leave and go home, those who departed from South Africa were sent to the hotel, even though these passengers had been in the same flight for nearly nine hours. In fact my wife sat in the middle seat and next to two passengers who were allowed to go home. I found that self-defeating, but that is a story for another day. 

Throughout the year, the UK has moved several countries through different tiers. But South Africa, along with Zimbabwe, Malawi, and pretty much all Southern Africa debuted in the red list and remained there – much to the annoyance of South Africa’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Naledi Pandoor.

Why did South Africa remain in the red list? 

The UK never offered an official position as to why South Africa remained on the red list. For some time, it stood to reason that South Africa was not in control of infection rates, and the beta variant (also known as 501.V2 or B.1.351 and first identified in SA), was at one point thought to be the most infectious SARS Cov2 variants was out of control. After all, when the UK’s infection numbers were rocketing, South Africa was swift in banning passengers from the UK entirely.

But this explanation seemed to fall flat when India was moved from the red list to the amber list. India’s delta variant is straight from the pits of hell. It is more infectious than any other variant, affects the young as well as the elderly, spreads quickly, and is responsible for repeat infections among people who are already vaccinated. India’s own numbers were horrendous, at one point consistently registering more than a quarter million cases a day. 

READ | ‘Definitely not rooted in science’ – health experts slam UK’s decision to keep SA on red list

The United States led the list of confirmed active cases. India followed closely. At that time, South Africa was not even in the top 10. Its neighbours, Zimbabwe, and Malawi all had under 10,000 cases. They were off the red list. South Africa puzzlingly remained.

But there may have been one other reason that South Africa remained on the red list longer than it should have. A contact at Public Health England, told me that during several cluster meetings held by different Covid-19 response portfolios, security issues had been raised. 

What were these security issues? 

South Africa’s borders are gleefully ajar. It is a well-known and open secret that people from different countries can bribe their way past border officials without producing a passport, and that many illegal immigrants, especially from neighbouring countries, often pay border officials to have their passports “stamped out”. 

What is “stamping out”?

Stamping out is a practice where an immigrant in danger of overstaying their visitor visa will pay a border official to have their passport issued an exit stamp. Accordingly, that person will have left South Africa on paper, even though they remain in the country. In some instances, passports are stamped in, when the immigrant wants to exit the country. Perhaps critical is that people who overstay their visas can often get this fixed by paying officials to backdate entry and exit dates on passports.

South Africa’s law enforcement is aware of this practice and its priority crime police (HAWKS) have arrested border officials several times. 

According to my contacts, there were grave concerns raised that South Africa could be used as a gateway country, that, if it was placed on the amber list, people from countries that do not require a visa to enter South Africa could simply show up at the border, and have their passports stamped to indicate that they entered the country 11 days before the day they actually did – meaning they could board a plane to the UK the very same day and before spending ten days in the amber list country.

It is a plausible explanation that will surface again when vaccine passports become acceptable for international travel. As it is, anyone can get their passports backdated for as little as R300. South Africa’s police have already arrested people for issuing bogus vaccine documents. Zimbabwe has arrested several travellers for arriving with fake Covid tests from South Africa. The passengers make it past South Africa’s port health officials without notice. 

“It is one of those things that happens in Mzansi”, my wife Boipelo said to me as I penned this article. She is correct. But the whole world is watching, and they are catching up and catching on. So, while I ought to be angry for being left £4,570 (R92,544) out of pocket, I also understand that British authorities, like Zimbabwean authorities, have the right to step in and protect the public where South Africa’s lax border attitudes pose a danger to everyone else. 

– Maynard Manyowa is a Journalist and Documentary Film Maker based in Manchester, England. You can follow him on Twitter @iAmKudaMaynard

To receive Opinions Weekly, sign up for the newsletter here

*Want to respond to the columnist? Send your letter or article to [email protected] with your name and town or province. You are welcome to also send a profile picture. We encourage a diversity of voices and views in our readers’ submissions and reserve the right not to publish any and all submissions received.

Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.

Continue Reading