more Quotes
Connect with us

Entertainment news

Poco X5 Pro leaks with Snapdragon 778G, vanilla X5 with Snapdragon 695 follows – GSMArena.com news – GSMArena.com

A week ago the upcoming Poco X5 was spotted in the hands of a cricket star, but did you know that there is a Pro version on the way as well? That was news to us too, but a European retailer already list the device as “coming soon” and has posted an almost complete specs sheet.

The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro has a 6.67” AMOLED display with 1,080 x 2,400px resolution (20:9), according to the retailer. The refresh rate isn’t mentioned, unfortunately, but it should be 120Hz like the Poco X4 Pro.

Anyway, the phone is powered by the Snapdragon 778G, a solid all-round upgrade over the 695 found inside the X4 Pro. The retailer list two memory configurations – 6/128GB and 8/256GB – both of which have a microSD card slot. The phone apparently runs Android 12 with MIUI 14 for Poco.

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (possibly a reused X4 Pro image)

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (possibly a reused X4 Pro image)

The main camera features a large 108MP 1/1.52” image sensor (0.7µm pixels) with an f/1.9 aperture like last year’s model. Thanks to the upgraded chipset, however, 4K video recording is now possible (at 30fps, but still). The other cameras on the back are an 8MP ultra wide (118°) and a 2MP macro. On the front, a 16MP selfie camera.

The power system is the same as before with a large 5,000mAh battery and 67W wired-only charging. For protection, there is Gorilla Glass 5 on the front and an IP68 rating – that last part doesn’t sound like Poco’s MO, so it might be a mistake on the spec sheet (the X4 Pro is rated for only IP53).

There’s no word on the price yet. At launch the X4 Pro was €300 for a 6/128GB model (a little less with early bird pricing) and €350 for the 8/256GB one. Overall, the Poco X5 Pro doesn’t seem to change much, but that Snapdragon 778G will have a big impact on performance. As for colors, you will have three choices: Blue, Black and, of course, Poco Yellow.

The retailer also lists details for the Xiaomi Poco X5. This one sticks to the Snapdragon 695 (as seen in Geekbench) and has a 6.67” AMOLED display (1,080 x 2,400px) with 120Hz refresh rate, which makes us think the Pro has a 120Hz display as well. The base X5 has only an IP54 rating, which sounds more believable.

This vanilla model is similar to the Pro, though with some downgrades, starting with the 48MP main camera, which is still joined by an 8MP ultra wide (118°) and 2MP macro (don’t count on 4K, however). The selfie camera is down to 13MP.

Poco X5 (possibly reused images)
Poco X5 (possibly reused images)

Poco X5 (possibly reused images)

Another change is to the battery – the capacity remains at 5,000mAh, the charge speed drops to 33W.

Like its sibling, the Poco X5 is listed with 6/128GB and 8/256GB configurations (expandable with a microSD). There is no pricing info and no Poco X4 to use as a guide. The X5 offers three color choices: Green, Blue and Black.

Note: the Poco X5 Pro image looks identical to the X4 Pro. Maybe Xiaomi didn’t change the design, maybe the retailer reused an old image. The specs seem very close to the Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed.

As for the vanilla X5, the image looks remarkably like the Redmi K50i though the specs have little in common (plus, the listed colorways don’t match the images). The specs are much closer to the Redmi Note 12, save for the chipset.

Source 1 | Source 2

Continue Reading

Entertainment news

This strange donkey orchid uses UV light to trick bees into thinking it has food – Phys.org

This strange donkey orchid uses UV light to trick bees into thinking it has food
A winter donkey orchid (left) and a prickly bitter-pea. Credit: Cal Wood/iNaturalist; caitlind164/iNaturalist, CC BY

If you’ve ever compared a frozen pizza to the photo on the box, you know the feeling of being duped by appetizing looks.

In our latest study published in Ecology and Evolution, we show that animals—in this case, bees—are also prone to being tricked into making poor decisions, which explains a lot about how gaps in perception are exploited in nature.

When Charles Darwin was testing the theory of evolution 150 years ago, he looked at the interaction between flowering plants and the animals that forage to collect nectar.

This helped establish that flowers have adaptations to promote easier pollinator access, making it beneficial for the animal who gets a food “reward” from them. At the same time, it means the plants get pollinated and can reproduce.

One perplexing problem is some that reproduce by pollination are non-rewarding—the animal doesn’t get nectar from visiting the flower. This is true of certain orchids, yet these flowers are still visited by pollinators and survive well in nature.

<div data-thumb="https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2023/this-strange-donkey-or-2.jpg" data-src="https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/2023/this-strange-donkey-or-2.jpg" data-sub-html="Flower shape and colour properties of an orchid (upper row) and a native pea flower (lower row) shown in the field, as individual flowers, and with spectral measurements. Credit: Scaccabarozzi et al., 2023, Author provided”>

This strange donkey orchid uses UV light to trick bees into thinking it has food
Flower shape and colour properties of an orchid (upper row) and a native pea flower (lower row) shown in the field, as individual flowers, and with spectral measurements. Credit: Scaccabarozzi et al., 2023, Author provided

A mistaken identity

With the benefit of modern scientific tools like a spectrophotometer that measures the amount of color, digital ultraviolet (UV) photography and computer modeling of how bees see the world, our international team set out to understand how some orchids have evolved dazzling floral displays.

Our chosen species was the winter donkey orchid (Diuris brumalis), endemic to Western Australia. This non-rewarding, food deceptive plant blooms at the same time as rewarding native pea plants (Daviesia).

As a result, native Trichocolletes bees appear to mistake the orchid for legume plants frequently enough that the orchid gets pollinated.

We quantified the flower color signals from both plants, revealing the main component of the visual information perceived by a bee was in the short wavelength UV region of the spectrum.

This made sense—while our vision sees blue, green and red wavelengths of light as primary colors, bees can see UV reflected light but lack a channel for perceiving primary red.

By using computer models of bee pollinator perception, we observed the orchid mimic species and the native pea plant species did actually look similar in color to bees.

<div data-thumb="https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2023/this-strange-donkey-or-3.jpg" data-src="https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/2023/this-strange-donkey-or-3.jpg" data-sub-html="UV photographs of orchid flowers (upper left panel) in natural state and also with applied UV blocking screen. Middle panels show false-colour photographs of flower appearance for a bee, and right hand panel a computer model of how bee vision perceives flower colours. Credit: Scaccabarozzi et al., 2023, Author provided”>

This strange donkey orchid uses UV light to trick bees into thinking it has food
UV photographs of orchid flowers (upper left panel) in natural state and also with applied UV blocking screen. Middle panels show false-colour photographs of flower appearance for a bee, and right hand panel a computer model of how bee vision perceives flower colours. Credit: Scaccabarozzi et al., 2023, Author provided

Putting a UV block on flowers

What was surprising, however, was the non-rewarding orchid flowers—pollinated by deception—actually have more conspicuous advertising for bee vision.

For example, the main display outer flower petals were significantly larger on the orchid plants, and also produced a stronger UV color signal.

To understand if such signaling was biologically relevant, we next conducted with the plants. We used a special UV sun-blocking solution to remove the strong UV signals in half of the orchid species, while the other half retained their natural appearance.

At the completion of the field season, several months latter, we could measure which plants were more successfully pollinated by bees, revealing the strong UV signals had a significant role in promoting pollination in the orchids.

A second interesting finding of the field experiments was the distance between the pea flowers and their copycat orchids was a major factor in the success of the orchids’ deception strategy.

If the orchids with strong UV signals were within close proximity—a meter or two—to the rewarding native pea flowers, the deception was less successful and few orchid flowers were pollinated. However, if the deceptive were about eight meters away from the rewarding model species, this produced the highest success rate in pollination.

Why deception works

It turns out a distance of about eight meters is important because of the way bee brains process color. When bees see a pair of colors in , they can evaluate them at the same time. This leads to very precise color matching. A similar process happens in —we also have to see colors at the same time.

However, seeing color stimuli with a time interval in between means the brain has to remember the first color, inspect the second color, and make a mental calculation about whether the two samples are indeed the same.

Neither bee brains, nor our own, are good at successive color comparisons. This is why when we purchase paint for a repair job we take a sample to get a precise match, rather than try and remember what we thought the color should look like.

Deceptive flowers are successful by exploiting this perceptual gap in how brains have to code information when need to fly several meters in search of more food.

By using a “look at me” strategy (essentially, better advertising than other plants) it is possible to survive in nature without actually offering a food reward to the pollinators. To do this, the plants need to be at an optimal distance from the plants they are mimicking. Not too close and not too far, and success is assured.

More information:
Daniela Scaccabarozzi et al, Mimicking orchids lure bees from afar with exaggerated ultraviolet signals, Ecology and Evolution (2023). DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9759

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation:
This strange donkey orchid uses UV light to trick bees into thinking it has food (2023, February 2)
retrieved 2 February 2023
from https://phys.org/news/2023-02-strange-donkey-orchid-uv-bees.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Continue Reading

Entertainment news

The world’s oldest fossils or oily gunk? Research suggests these 3.5 billion-year-old rocks don’t contain signs of life – Phys.org

The world's oldest fossils or oily gunk? Research suggests these 3.5 billion-year-old rocks don't contain signs of life
Credit: Saul Shepstein, Author provided

The Pilbara region of Western Australia is home to one of the most ancient surviving pieces of Earth’s crust, which has been geologically unchanged since its creation some 3.5 billion years ago.

Some of the oldest signs of life have been found here, in the North Pole area west of the town of Marble Bar, in black rocks composed of fine-grained quartz called chert.

Some features in the so-called “Apex chert” have been identified as the fossilized remains of microbes much like the bacteria that still survive today. However, scientists have debated the true origin of these features ever since they were discovered 30 years ago.

In new research published in Science Advances, we show the carbon-rich compounds also found in the chert may have been produced by non-biological processes. This suggests the supposed “fossils” are not remnants of early lifeforms but rather artifacts of chemical and geological processes.

Controversial Pilbara fossils

In 1993, American paleobiologist William Schopf spotted carbon-rich filaments in outcrops of the 3.45 billion year old Apex chert. He interpreted them as the charred remains of fossilized microbes similar to cyanobacteria, which were Earth’s first oxygen-producing organisms and are still abundant today.

The world's oldest fossils or oily gunk? Research suggests these 3.5 billion-year-old rocks don't contain signs of life
Veins of black chert found in the Pilbara open a window onto Earth as it was 3.5 billion years ago. Credit: Birger Rasmussen

The existence of fossilized cyanobacteria in such old rocks would imply that life was already pumping oxygen into the air more than a billion years before Earth’s atmosphere became rich in oxygen.

A key piece of evidence in favor of life was the association of with the ancient fossils. This is because living cells are made up of large , which comprise mainly carbon as well as hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and other elements.

In 2002, Schopf’s interpretation was challenged by English paleobiologist Martin Brasier and his team. They showed the “fossils” displayed a variety of shapes and sizes uncharacteristic of cyanobacteria, and indeed, inconsistent with microbial life. What’s more, they also showed the -bearing black cherts were not horizontal beds deposited on the seafloor, but angled veins cutting across the underlying layers of rock.

The fossil-bearing cherts appeared to have formed at high temperatures during . Brasier argued this environment was hostile to life and the “fossils” were, in fact, formed from graphite impurities in the rock. They also speculated that the carbon associated with the “fossils” may not even be biological in origin.

A lively debate ensued, and it has continued ever since.

<div data-thumb="https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2023/the-worlds-oldest-foss-2.jpg" data-src="https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/2023/the-worlds-oldest-foss-2.jpg" data-sub-html="Tiny structures like these, found in ancient black chert, have been interpreted as fossilised bacteria. Credit: Brasier et al.“>

The world's oldest fossils or oily gunk? Research suggests these 3.5 billion-year-old rocks don't contain signs of life
Tiny structures like these, found in ancient black chert, have been interpreted as fossilised bacteria. Credit: Brasier et al.

Microbes or hot fluids?

To try to determine where the carbon-rich deposits in the black chert veins came from, we took a very close look at them with a high-magnification electron microscope.

We found it did not come from fossilized bacteria. The oil-like substance occurs as residues in fractures and as petrified droplets, which have previously been mistaken for ancient fossils.

The textures in the black chert veins indicate they were formed when hot fluids rich in silica and carbon moved through cracks in lava flows below vents in the seafloor similar to modern “black smoker” vents. Upon approaching the seafloor, the hot fluids infiltrated layers of volcanic sediment, replacing it with black chert.

If the carbon came from such a hot fluid, this supports findings that the carbon-rich filaments in the Apex chert are not fossils. However, it also raises a new question.

Typically, organic compounds such as oil and gas, which are referred to as “fossil fuels” because they form from the dead remains of algae, bacteria and plants, are generated when these remains are buried and heated to temperatures above 65℃. Chemical reactions release organic compounds, which may accumulate to form oil and gas fields.

However, the sediments from the North Pole area are very thin (less than 50m thick), poor in organic molecules, and sandwiched between kilometers of lava flows. So, how did the organic compounds form in such surroundings?

The world's oldest fossils or oily gunk? Research suggests these 3.5 billion-year-old rocks don't contain signs of life
Black chert veins may have formed when water came into contact with lava at seafloor vents. Credit: NOAA

Seafloor vents on early Earth

A possible alternative pathway is suggested from experimental evidence and research on Martian meteorites. In the absence of traditional biological sources, some of the organic molecules in the chert veins could have formed by non-biological processes.

For instance, when hot water circulates through lava or other igneous rock, water and carbon dioxide can react with mineral surfaces to form organic compounds. Similar reactions have been proposed to explain the presence of organic molecules in Martian meteorites and in some igneous rocks on Earth.

The carbon in black cherts from the Pilbara outback may therefore represent relics of organic compounds that were produced by reactions between water and rock. Indeed, on the early Earth seafloor vents may have created more organic compounds than biological processes did, making it difficult to distinguish between authentic carbon-bearing fossils and oily artifacts.

While more work is underway, early results suggest life was only just surviving 3.5 billion years ago, struggling to gain a foothold in an inhospitable environment. The world then was wracked by regular volcanic eruptions that covered Earth’s surface in lava, and bathed in harsh solar radiation streaming through an atmosphere with no protective ozone layer.

Looking further back in time, the black cherts offer a glimpse of a lifeless planet. Reactions between water and rock at seafloor vents produced a cocktail of organic compounds, perhaps supplying the raw materials for the assembly of the first living cells.

More information:
Birger Rasmussen et al, Organic carbon generation in 3.5-billion-year-old basalt-hosted seafloor hydrothermal vent systems, Science Advances (2023). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add7925

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation:
The world’s oldest fossils or oily gunk? Research suggests these 3.5 billion-year-old rocks don’t contain signs of life (2023, February 2)
retrieved 2 February 2023
from https://phys.org/news/2023-02-world-oldest-fossils-oily-gunk.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Continue Reading

Entertainment news

‘Angel Wings’ for Satellites Could Help Mitigate Space Junk – CNET

As futuristic as this sounds, real estate in space is booming. Major corporations and science research organizations are actively vying to send satellites into orbit for extraordinary reasons — developing free internet connection; enhancing GPS systems; monitoring climate change; even analyzing Albert Einstein’s trippy general relativity equations

But while humanity continues to advance technologically, experts are growing increasingly worried about a major issue: We’ve found a new area of the universe to pollute. As of 2021, NASA said, more than 27,000 pieces of orbital debris, or “space junk,” resided in our planet’s gravitational tides — and since then, SpaceX alone has sent hundreds more satellites up there

Typically, when they’re done with their equipment, scientists kind of just wait until stuff in Earth’s orbit starts deorbiting and eventually burns up in our atmosphere. This natural process, however, can take a very (very) long time. 

Thus, hoping to pave a cleaner future for our space-y dreams, the European Space Agency announced the strengthening promise of its innovative, prototype aluminum-coated sail. This device can ride up to orbit with a satellite and help it deorbit whenever.

The concept is called the Drag Augmentation Deorbiting System, or ADEO, braking sail — and in late December, the smallest of its kind completed its final successful demo mission since the program’s seminal one in 2018.

A silver space sail is seen with a gleaming star in the background.A silver space sail is seen with a gleaming star in the background.

An artist’s impression of ESA’s prototype braking sail concept.


ESA

How does it work?

Basically, ESA folded up the 3.5-square meter (38-foot) sail until it could fit in what essentially looks like a 10 centimeter (4 inch) jack-in-the-box package. Scientists then attached the component to a privately built spacecraft called the ION satellite carrier. ION was launched via a Falcon 9 rocket on June 30, 2021.

Then, in December 2022, the sail was deployed to showcase a silvery polyamide membrane secured to four carbon reinforced arms positioned in an X-shape. That increased what’s known as the satellite carrier’s atmospheric surface drag, which refers to a force generated by atoms near the top of the atmosphere that travel opposite to the relative motion of something in low Earth orbit. You can think of drag as friction, but with air.

With such a bolstered drag effect, the spacecraft started lowering its orbital altitude at an accelerated pace, expediting the satellite’s ultimate demise: burning up in Earth’s atmosphere.

“The ADEO-N sail will ensure that the satellite will re-enter in around one year and three months, while otherwise it would have reentered in four to five years,” Tiziana Cardone, an ESA structural engineer who oversaw the project, said in a statement.

Earth is seen in the distance from the ION satellite's perspective. Covering most of the screen is part of the breaking space sail.Earth is seen in the distance from the ION satellite's perspective. Covering most of the screen is part of the breaking space sail.

A camera view from the ION satellite after it unfurled the sail.


HTS

For a wonderful mental picture of all this, ESA thinks of the silver sail as the satellite’s “angel wings,” softly helping it float toward its death. The official name of ADEO’s latest mission was, aptly, “Show Me Your Wings.”

Going forward, the agency says this sail can also be scaled up or down depending on what kind of satellite it’s connected to. 

“The largest variation can be as big as 100 square meters and take up to 45 [minutes] to deploy,” the agency said in a press release. “The smallest sail is just 3.5 square meters and deploy in just 0.8 seconds!”

Passive drag systems like this one aren’t exactly a new concept. According to NASA, such devices represent the most “common deorbit device” for satellites orbiting in low Earth orbit, and present an advantage because they’re quite easy to deal with and can be stored super compactly. 

But what’s striking about ESA’s recent achievement with ADEO is that it seems to be working extremely well, keeping in line with widespread efforts to mitigate the huge issue of space junk. Last year, for instance, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a new “five-year rule” for deorbiting satellites, down from the previous 25 years, and ESA itself has a major initiative to address space pollution.

“We want to establish a zero debris policy, which means if you bring a spacecraft into orbit you have to remove it,” Josef Aschbacher, ESA’s director general, said in a statement last year.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2021 ZimFocus.

www.luzroyale.ky/

www.1africafocus.com

www.zimfocus.co.zw

www.classifieds.com/

One Zimbabwe Classifieds | ZimMarket

www.classifiedszim.com

www.1zimbabweclassifieds.co.zw

www.1southafricaclassifieds.com

www.1africaclassifieds.com

www.1usaclassifieds.com

www.computertraining.co.zw/

www.1itonlinetraining.com/

www.bbs-bitsbytesandstem.com/

Zimbabwe Market Classifieds | ZimMarket

1 Zimbabwe Market Classifieds | ZimMarket

www.1zimlegends.com

Linking Buyers To Sellers Is Our Business Tradition